Research Paper on Malcolm X
The assassination of Malcolm X made headlines in almost every newspaper, magazine, and broadcast. Every different piece of media chose different ways to distinguish the story by allowing the reader to experience the assassination as if it was right in front of them. Each of the five newspapers that were chosen used their own word choice, tone, and information for their audience in order to get their point across. The New York Times and the New York Post were two of the newspapers that seem to have different views on the events of February 21, 1965.
The New York Times portrayed Malcolm X as a “Negro Extremist” who was the leader of a Black Nationalist movement. The New York Times made clear that this assassination wasn’t a racial feud between white supremacist and the Negro race. The newspaper gave clear notice of who the killer was and what race as they noted from a police spokesman saying the 22-year-old Negro, Thomas Hagan was being held on charges for the murder of Malcolm X. The New York Times added in their article gruesome details of the event , stating that Malcolm was struck with seven bullets from Hagan’s weapon, which was not listed. The article also featured a eye-witness account of about thirty other shots were fired during the carnage as men, women, and children were trying to escape the flying bullets by plunging under tables. The newspaper article once again letting the audience know that the assassination was a result of a feud between the Black Muslims and Malcolm X and his followers.
The New York Post used a first person viewpoint in their article dated on February 22, 2003, a day after the assassination. The New York Post felt that by publishing their article in first person they would without a doubt allow the audience to experience the event first hand. This newspaper portrayed Malcolm X as a “savior” who wasn’t holding this gathering in the Audubon Ballroom to be an aggressive leader who ready for war with whomever firebombed his home the week before. The article portrayed all the Malcolm X followers as loyal people who had a grudge against the white race. The article states that one man was quoted as saying, “Malcolm is our only hope. You can depend on him to tell it like it is and to give Whitey hell.” The New York Post gives clippings of what Malcolm X began to say as he was ready to speak to his supporters. The eye-witness account noted that in the beginning of the speech two men began arguing, while a scuffle broke out in the back soon after. An in-depth detail the eye-witness account tells, that all hell broke loose as he heard stifled shots from a un-identified weapon and saw Malcolm X fall lifelessly over chairs from gunshot wounds. The account also adds that people were screaming from all sides of the ballroom with words like, “Don’t let them kill him.” The eye-witness doesn’t leave out that the men with the weapons didn’t go away without any wounds. The men were reported as being slaughtered by the bodyguards of Malcolm X.
The two newspaper articles that published the events on that day did use a small amount of pieces of information that was relevant in both articles. Both articles gave a brief location of where the assassination took place even though they didn’t use the same context. The ways the newspapers went about stating the information of the terrible tragedy were somewhat alike, only having their own perspectives sound different.
From the viewpoint of the writers of the two articles, they both had different feelings toward Malcolm X and how he went about everyday life. However, if reading one article or another, the audience would get two distinctive ideas about the whole tragedy. If questioning the different audiences, it would be easy to tell how diverse the articles truly were. In terms of how the article was portraying Malcolm X and the awful tragedy that led to his death., the audience would tend to believe discrete stories and come up with unique outcomes of the true events that really went down on that horrible day.
The New York Times portrayed Malcolm X as a “Negro Extremist” who was the leader of a Black Nationalist movement. The New York Times made clear that this assassination wasn’t a racial feud between white supremacist and the Negro race. The newspaper gave clear notice of who the killer was and what race as they noted from a police spokesman saying the 22-year-old Negro, Thomas Hagan was being held on charges for the murder of Malcolm X. The New York Times added in their article gruesome details of the event , stating that Malcolm was struck with seven bullets from Hagan’s weapon, which was not listed. The article also featured a eye-witness account of about thirty other shots were fired during the carnage as men, women, and children were trying to escape the flying bullets by plunging under tables. The newspaper article once again letting the audience know that the assassination was a result of a feud between the Black Muslims and Malcolm X and his followers.
We can write a custom research paper on Malcolm X for you!
The New York Post used a first person viewpoint in their article dated on February 22, 2003, a day after the assassination. The New York Post felt that by publishing their article in first person they would without a doubt allow the audience to experience the event first hand. This newspaper portrayed Malcolm X as a “savior” who wasn’t holding this gathering in the Audubon Ballroom to be an aggressive leader who ready for war with whomever firebombed his home the week before. The article portrayed all the Malcolm X followers as loyal people who had a grudge against the white race. The article states that one man was quoted as saying, “Malcolm is our only hope. You can depend on him to tell it like it is and to give Whitey hell.” The New York Post gives clippings of what Malcolm X began to say as he was ready to speak to his supporters. The eye-witness account noted that in the beginning of the speech two men began arguing, while a scuffle broke out in the back soon after. An in-depth detail the eye-witness account tells, that all hell broke loose as he heard stifled shots from a un-identified weapon and saw Malcolm X fall lifelessly over chairs from gunshot wounds. The account also adds that people were screaming from all sides of the ballroom with words like, “Don’t let them kill him.” The eye-witness doesn’t leave out that the men with the weapons didn’t go away without any wounds. The men were reported as being slaughtered by the bodyguards of Malcolm X.
The two newspaper articles that published the events on that day did use a small amount of pieces of information that was relevant in both articles. Both articles gave a brief location of where the assassination took place even though they didn’t use the same context. The ways the newspapers went about stating the information of the terrible tragedy were somewhat alike, only having their own perspectives sound different.
From the viewpoint of the writers of the two articles, they both had different feelings toward Malcolm X and how he went about everyday life. However, if reading one article or another, the audience would get two distinctive ideas about the whole tragedy. If questioning the different audiences, it would be easy to tell how diverse the articles truly were. In terms of how the article was portraying Malcolm X and the awful tragedy that led to his death., the audience would tend to believe discrete stories and come up with unique outcomes of the true events that really went down on that horrible day.
- CAUTION! Free research paper samples & examples on Malcolm X are 100% plagiarized!!!
At EssayLib.com - professional research writing service - you can buy custom research papers on any topics and disciplines, 100% written from scratch. EssayLib.com employs top-rated Ph.D. and Master's experts only to write superior-quality custom essays, term papers, research papers, thesis & dissertations at affordable rates. EssayLib.com knows HOW effectively to help high school, college & university students with writing the highest grade custom papers online.
